Posted on

Budget 2026

The Singapore Budget 2026, delivered on February 12, 2026, focuses on helping companies navigate high operating costs while positioning Singapore as a global “AI Nation.” Below is a comprehensive guide to the latest policies, tax reliefs, and grants available for companies.

Corporate Tax & Cost Relief

To provide immediate cash flow support, the government has introduced a tax rebate for the upcoming Year of Assessment (YA).

FeatureYA 2025 (Previous)YA 2026 (New)
Rebate Rate50%40%
Maximum Cap$40,000$30,000
CIT Rebate Cash Grant$2,000$1,500

  • Maximizing the Cap: To fully utilize the $30,000 tax rebate, a company’s estimated taxable income should be approximately **$540,000** (assuming a 17% tax rate before other exemptions).

  • Cash Grant Eligibility: Companies that employed at least one local worker in 2025 will receive a minimum of $1,500, even if they are not profitable.

Carbon Tax Update

The carbon tax has increased to $45/tCO2e for 2026. To mitigate this, the Energy Efficiency Grant (EEG) has been significantly enhanced.

  • Carbon Tax Impact: With the jump to $45, a facility emitting 5,000 tonnes of $CO_2$ faces a tax bill of $225,000.

  • EEG Base Tier: Supports up to 70% for SMEs (capped at $30,000) for pre-approved equipment like high-efficiency HVAC and LED lighting.

  • EEG Advanced Tier: Provides a combined cap of $350,000 for large-scale projects demonstrating at least 350 tonnes of lifetime carbon abatement.

  • Sectors: Now expanded to Manufacturing, Food Services, Retail, Construction, Maritime, and Data Centres.

    To apply: Via  Enterprise.sg

AI Innovation & The "AI Nation" Push

Budget 2026 moves beyond general digitalization to deep AI integration.

Champions of AI Programme

A new flagship initiative designed for mature enterprises to move beyond experimentation.

  • Customized Roadmaps: Direct consultancy to integrate AI into core business models.

  • Workforce Reskilling: Tailored training to ensure teams can manage AI-driven processes.

  • National Missions: Opportunities to lead sector-wide AI projects in logistics, healthcare, and finance.

Enterprise Innovation Scheme (EIS) Expansion

The EIS allows for a 400% tax deduction on qualifying activities.

  • Current Activities: R&D, IP registration, IP acquisition/licensing, and training.

  • 2026 Revision: Now includes AI Expenditure (software licenses, AI-specific hardware, and consultancy).

  • Cap: The AI category is capped at $50,000 of expenditure for YA 2027 and YA 2028.

Startup SG Equity

An additional $1 billion injection to support deep-tech startups.

  • To Qualify: Must be a Singapore-based Private Ltd (<5 years old), have $50,000 paid-up capital, and show significant IP/innovation.

  • To Apply: Submit pitch decks via the Startup SG Website.

Manpower & Payroll Changes

Local Qualifying Salary (LQS) Impact

Effective July 1, 2026, the LQS rises to $1,800 (from $1,600).

ComponentAt $1,600 (Old)At $1,800 (New)
Gross Salary$1,600$1,800
Employer CPF (17%)$272$306
Total Monthly Cost$1,872$2,106

Total Increase: $234 per worker/month. Note that PWCS co-funding (at 30%) helps offset this for 2026.

Work Passes & Senior Credits

  • Employment Pass (EP): Qualifying salaries rise in Jan 2027 to **$6,000** ($6,600 for FinServices). For older applicants (age 45+), the threshold is now $11,500.
  • Senior Employment Credit (SEC): Extended to end-2027. Provides up to a 7% wage offset for workers aged 60+ (earning up to $4k/month) to help cover the 0.5% Employer CPF hike.

Essential Grants Directory

GrantDetailsWebsite
MRA Grant70% support for overseas promotion & set-up.GoBusiness MRA
EDGSupport for core capabilities and sustainability.EnterpriseSG EDG
PSG50% funding (up to $30k) for pre-approved IT tools.Business Grants Portal
BizAdapt70% support for supply chain reconfiguration.EnterpriseSG BizAdapt
DTDi200% tax deduction; claim cap raised to **$400k**.EnterpriseSG DTDi

Pro-Tip: Most grants are processed through the Business Grants Portal (BGP). You will need a CorpPass to apply.

Posted on

Revisions to Singapore’s Simplified Liquidation Programme (SLP)

The Singapore Government has implemented revisions to the Simplified Insolvency Programme (SIP), specifically affecting the Simplified Liquidation Programme (SLP) administered by the Insolvency and Public Trustee’s Office under the oversight of the Ministry of Law.

The revisions refine eligibility parameters, strengthen governance safeguards, and clarify administrative procedures to ensure the programme remains targeted at genuinely small and straightforward insolvencies.

Below is a focused summary of the key revisions.

  1. Programme Extension and Continuation

Originally introduced as a temporary COVID-19 relief measure, the SLP has been extended beyond its initial sunset period. This reflects the Government’s view that a streamlined liquidation pathway remains necessary for micro and small enterprises (MSEs).

The extension confirms the SLP as a continuing simplified alternative to a standard creditors’ voluntary liquidation under the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 (IRDA).

  1. Refined Eligibility Thresholds

The S$2 million total liabilities cap remains in place. However, assessment criteria have been tightened to ensure:

  • Companies with complex asset structures are excluded
  • Cases involving significant related-party transactions receive closer scrutiny
  • Companies with incomplete accounting records may be rejected

The revision reinforces that SLP is strictly for simple, low-asset, low-liability cases.

  1. Enhanced Screening and Safeguards

IPTO has strengthened its screening process before approving entry into SLP. Key areas of review now include:

  • Antecedent transactions (e.g. undervalue transactions, unfair preferences)
  • Director conduct prior to insolvency
  • Asset dissipation risk
  • Ongoing or threatened litigation

Where material concerns arise, companies may be directed to proceed under a standard liquidation route instead.

  1. Clarification of Director Responsibilities

The revisions emphasise that simplified procedure does not reduce statutory duties. Directors remain fully subject to:

  • Wrongful trading provisions
  • Record-keeping requirements
  • Fiduciary obligations

Failure to comply may result in investigation or personal liability, even if the company enters SLP.

  1. Administrative Streamlining Maintained

While governance has been strengthened, the core objectives of SLP remain unchanged:

  • Streamlined reporting
  • Reduced procedural steps
  • Lower liquidation costs
  • Faster case completion timeline

This ensures that small companies with limited estates are not disproportionately burdened by liquidation expenses.

Practical Implications

The revised framework signals a shift from pandemic relief to structured, risk-managed simplified insolvency.

Companies considering SLP should now expect:

  • More rigorous upfront review
  • Greater scrutiny of financial records
  • Less tolerance for governance deficiencies

Early professional assessment is advisable to determine suitability before application.

 

Posted on

Missing Trader Fraud and GST Input Tax Claims: What Businesses Need to Know

The Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) has stepped up audits and investigations into Missing Trader Fraud (MTF), a form of GST fraud that can expose businesses to significant tax adjustments, penalties, and interest—even where the business believes it has acted in good faith.

This article outlines what Missing Trader Fraud is, why it matters, and the practical steps businesses must take to protect their GST input tax claims.

What Is Missing Trader Fraud?

Missing Trader Fraud typically arises when a supplier charges GST on sales but subsequently:

  • Fails to report the taxable supplies to IRAS; and

  • Does not account for or pay the output tax collected; and

  • Becomes uncontactable or ceases operations.

In such cases, IRAS may disallow the purchaser’s input tax claims if it concludes that the purchaser knew or should have known that the transaction was connected to fraudulent activity.

IRAS Audit Focus and the Knowledge Principle

IRAS applies the Knowledge Principle, under which input tax claims may be denied if a business:

  • Had actual knowledge of the fraud; or

  • Should reasonably have known, based on the circumstances, that the transaction was linked to Missing Trader Fraud.

Importantly, the absence of intent to defraud does not automatically protect a business. The key consideration is whether reasonable due diligence was performed.

IRAS has published guidance and conducts audits specifically targeting Missing Trader Fraud arrangements.

IRAS’ Three-Pillar Due Diligence Framework

To mitigate the risk of being implicated in Missing Trader Fraud, IRAS expects GST-registered businesses to implement due diligence measures based on the following three pillars:

Pillar 1: Identify and Assess Risk Indicators

Businesses should be alert to red flags such as:

  • Unusually low pricing or abnormal profit margins

  • Newly incorporated or dormant suppliers

  • Cash-only transactions or complex payment flows

  • Requests for rapid or backdated transactions

Pillar 2: Perform Due Diligence Checks

easonable checks should be performed and documented, including:

  • Verifying the supplier’s GST registration status

  • Understanding the supplier’s business activities and operating premises

  • Reviewing contractual terms and commercial rationale

  • Confirming bank account ownership and payment arrangements

Pillar 3: Respond to Identified Risks

Where risks are identified, businesses are expected to:

  • Seek clarifications or supporting documentation

  • Escalate concerns internally

  • Reconsider or decline the transaction if risks cannot be satisfactorily addressed

Merely identifying risks without taking appropriate follow-up action may not be sufficient.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

Where IRAS determines that due diligence was not performed to a reasonable standard, it may:

  • Deny GST input tax claims

  • Impose penalties and late payment interest

  • Initiate further audits or investigations

These outcomes can arise even if the underlying goods or services were genuinely received.

Practical Takeaways for Businesses

  • Due diligence is not optional—it is a key condition for protecting GST input tax claims.

  • Documentation is critical. Businesses should retain evidence of checks performed.

  • Higher-risk industries and transactions warrant enhanced scrutiny.

  • Internal GST controls and supplier onboarding procedures should be reviewed regularly.

Conclusion

Missing Trader Fraud remains a significant compliance risk in Singapore’s GST landscape. IRAS expects businesses to act with commercial awareness and to take proactive steps to assess and manage GST risks in their supply chains.

Implementing robust due diligence procedures aligned with IRAS’ guidance is essential to safeguarding GST input tax claims and avoiding costly disputes with the tax authority.

Posted on

CPF Changes Coming on 1 January 2026

Singapore’s updated CPF rules will take effect from 1 January 2026, and employers should prepare ahead to avoid compliance issues and unexpected payroll cost increases. Here are the key updates and what they mean for your business

Key CPF Changes

  • The CPF Ordinary Wage ceiling will increase from S$7,400 to S$8,000, meaning a larger portion of monthly salaries will be subject to CPF.

  • Higher CPF contribution rates for senior workers:

    • Ages 55–60: Total rate increases to 34%

    • Ages 60–65: Total rate increases to 25%

  • Additional contributions for senior workers will be channelled into their Retirement Account (RA) to strengthen long-term retirement adequacy.

What This Means for Your Business

  • Higher manpower costs:
    Employers will incur increased CPF contributions, especially for:

    • Employees aged 55 to 65

    • Staff earning above S$7,400, up to the new S$8,000 ceiling

  • Budget & costing impact:
    Companies should update FY2026 budgets, revise manpower costing, and adjust financial forecasts to account for increased statutory expenses.

  • Payroll system updates:
    HR and payroll systems must be updated to apply:

    • New wage ceiling (S$8,000)

    • New age-based CPF contribution rates

  • Cash flow considerations:
    Monthly CPF outflow will rise, affecting cash management for businesses with senior or higher-paid employees.

  • Communication to staff:
    Senior employees may experience slightly lower take-home pay due to higher employee CPF deductions.

Recommended Action for Employers

  • Review and revise payroll budgets for 2026

  • Update HRIS/payroll systems and CPF calculation templates

  • Perform manpower cost impact analysis

  • Communicate changes to affected employees early

Posted on

What Are Scope 1 and Scope 2 Emissions?

As sustainability reporting becomes increasingly central to Singapore’s regulatory landscape, businesses must understand the fundamentals of greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting. Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions are defined under the GHG Protocol and adopted in ISSB/IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures, which guide Singapore’s emerging climate reporting requirements.

Emission Calculation Formula

Greenhouse gas emissions are commonly calculated using:

Emissions (tCO₂e) = Activity Data × Emission Factor × Global Warming Potential (if applicable)

Singapore-aligned emission factors are primarily sourced from:

  • ✔ National Environment Agency (NEA)

  • ✔ IPCC Guidelines (where local factors are unavailable)

Scope 1: Direct Emissions (with Example)

Scope 1 emissions arise from sources that a company owns or directly controls, including:

  • Fuel used in company vehicles

  • Diesel or natural gas burned in generators or boilers

  • Refrigerant leakage from cooling systems

  • Emissions from onsite industrial activities

Example – Company Vehicle Using Diesel

Fuel consumption: 5,000 litres of diesel
Emission factor: 2.68 kg CO₂e per litre

Emissions = 5,000 × 2.68 = 13,400 kg CO₂e
= 13.4 tCO₂e

Scope 2: Indirect Energy Emissions (with Example)

Scope 2 emissions cover indirect GHG emissions from purchased electricity, steam, heating, or cooling. In Singapore, the main component is grid electricity consumption.

Example – Office Electricity Use

Annual electricity consumption: 50,000 kWh
Singapore grid emission factor: 0.408 kg CO₂e per kWh

Emissions = 50,000 × 0.408 = 20,400 kg CO₂e
= 20.4 tCO₂e

Understanding how to classify and calculate Scopes 1 and 2 is essential for compliance, credibility, and effective sustainability management. If your organisation requires guidance in emissions measurement or reporting, our team is ready to support you.

Posted on

Singapore’s Evolving ESG and Climate-Reporting Requirements

Singapore is entering a new phase of ESG regulation as it moves towards climate-reporting standards aligned with the ISSB/IFRS framework. The shift aims to enhance transparency, improve comparability, and strengthen market confidence—all essential to supporting sustainable finance.

Current Regime

Singapore is implementing mandatory climate-related disclosures (CRD) in phases, with transitional relief for Scope 3 reporting and external assurance. SGX-listed companies already conduct mandatory sustainability reporting, forming the base for the enhanced ISSB-aligned requirements

What’s Changing

For SGX-listed companies

  • From FY2025: Mandatory ISSB-aligned climate disclosures, including Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions.

  • From FY2026: Broader ISSB requirements and mandatory Scope 3 reporting for STI companies.

  • By FY2029: External limited assurance required for Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions.

For large non-listed companies

  • From FY2030: Mandatory ISSB-aligned climate disclosures (Scope 1 and Scope 2) for companies meeting specified size thresholds.

Why It Matters

  • Listed companies: Must upgrade data systems, emissions measurement processes, and governance to meet strengthened disclosure and assurance expectations.

  • Large private companies: Should begin capability-building early to prepare for future mandatory reporting.

  • Investors and lenders: Will benefit from more consistent, comparable, and verifiable climate-related information.

  • Singapore’s broader ecosystem: Gains stronger global alignment and enhanced access to sustainable finance opportunities.

Commercial Impact — Procurement

Environmental performance is increasingly embedded in procurement practices across both public and private sectors.

Examples include:

  • Government procurement allocating up to 5% of tender points to environmental criteria.

  • Changi Airport Group requiring minimum environmental scores for qualification.

  • SMRT applying a 5% sustainability weighting and requiring Scope 3 emissions disclosures from bidders.

Strong ESG performance is becoming directly linked to contract eligibility and competitive advantage.

Conclusion

Singapore’s ESG landscape is evolving quickly, with mandatory climate-related disclosures set to expand across industries. Organisations will need to enhance reporting capabilities, strengthen emissions measurement, and reinforce governance to remain compliant and competitive.

If your organisation requires support with ESG compliance, climate reporting, or tender-readiness, our team is ready to assist at every stage.

Posted on

Accounting for Cryptoassets

As cryptoassets become increasingly common in commercial transactions and investment portfolios, companies must understand how to account for them appropriately under Singapore Financial Reporting Standards (International) [SFRS(I)]. Unlike traditional assets, cryptoassets do not fall neatly into existing categories such as cash, cash equivalents, or financial instruments, and therefore require careful classification based on their characteristics and intended use.

Classification of Cryptoassets

Cryptoassets generally fall into four broad categories:

  • Cryptocurrencies – Digital currencies used as a medium of exchange or store of value.

  • Utility Tokens – Tokens granting access to specific services, platforms, or products.

  • Asset Tokens – Tokens representing ownership or rights to underlying physical or financial assets.

  • Security Tokens – Tokens that mirror the economic rights of traditional securities such as equity or debt.

The accounting treatment depends on which category the asset falls into.

Accounting Treatment

Cryptocurrencies

  • If held for trading, they may be classified as inventory under SFRS(I) 2.

  • Otherwise, they typically meet the definition of intangible assets under SFRS(I) 1-38.

Utility Tokens

  • Depending on the holder’s purpose, they may be accounted for as inventory, intangible assets, prepayments, or financial instruments.

Asset Tokens

  • Accounting follows the standard relevant to the underlying asset the token represents.

Security Tokens

  • When they meet the definition of a financial asset, they fall under the scope of SFRS(I) 9 Financial Instruments.

Key Considerations for Businesses

Companies must evaluate cryptoassets based on their substance and economic reality, rather than solely their legal form. This assessment determines whether the asset represents a right to goods, services, cash flows, ownership interests, or simply an intangible digital resource. Because cryptoassets do not fit into one uniform accounting model, professional judgment and consistent application of relevant standards are essential.

Posted on

InvoiceNow in Singapore: Simple Compliance When You Have the Right Support

Singapore is moving toward widespread adoption of InvoiceNow, the Peppol-based e-invoicing network that enables faster, more accurate and secure invoicing. While the upcoming requirements may seem daunting, the truth is: with the right support, InvoiceNow implementation can be quick, smooth, and hassle-free.

Our team specialises in helping businesses transition seamlessly, from system setup to GST compliance — so you can stay focused on running your business

Who Must Comply and When? (GST-Related InvoiceNow Requirements)

IRAS has defined specific compliance dates for voluntary GST registrants.

Companies that voluntarily register for GST within 6 months of incorporation

Compliance Date: From 1 November 2025
Newly incorporated companies registering early for GST must adopt InvoiceNow from this date.

All new voluntary GST registrants (regardless of incorporation date)

Compliance Date: From 1 April 2026
Any business voluntarily registering for GST on or after this date must begin issuing and receiving e-invoices through InvoiceNow.

These requirements mean that many new or growing businesses will need to adopt InvoiceNow as part of their GST onboarding process — and we can help ensure that transition is smooth and compliant.

Mandatory Requirement for Government Vendors – Effective 1 November 2025

From 1 November 2025, all new vendors onboarding with Singapore Government agencies must issue e-invoices exclusively through InvoiceNow.

This means:

  • You must be InvoiceNow-ready before contracting with government entities

  • PDF or paper invoices will no longer be accepted

  • Accurate e-invoice transmission becomes essential to avoid payment delays

With our support, we can ensure you meet the requirement well ahead of time.

How We Make InvoiceNow Adoption Easy for Your Business

Implementing InvoiceNow does not need to be complex. We specialise in helping companies of all sizes adopt it smoothly, with minimal disruption.

1. Guided System Setup and Activation

We handle the entire setup process:

  • Checking if your accounting software is InvoiceNow-ready

  • Activating your Peppol connection

  • Configuring your UEN and business profile

  • Ensuring invoices flow correctly into your accounting system

This means you avoid technical issues and enjoy a working solution from the start.

2. End-to-End Outsourced Accounting Support

Our accounting team ensures your operations run seamlessly after adoption:

  • Bookkeeping fully aligned with e-invoice workflows

  • AP/AR monitoring to ensure invoices are correctly sent and received

  • Troubleshooting any integration or data issues

  • Preparing monthly and quarterly reports incorporating InvoiceNow data

We take care of the accounting, so you don’t have to.

3. GST Review and Compliance Assurance

nvoiceNow still requires correct GST reporting — and we help ensure accuracy:

  • Checking GST codes and tax classification within your e-invoices

  • Verifying that your InvoiceNow data meets IRAS standards

  • Conducting periodic GST health checks

  • Supporting you during GST queries or audits

This reduces your compliance risk while maintaining smooth invoicing operations.

Let Us Make Your Digital Transition Seamless

The effective dates for InvoiceNow adoption are approaching — but with our support, implementation becomes easy, structured, and worry-free.

Whether you need help with InvoiceNow setup, outsourced accounting, or GST compliance, we’re here to guide you every step of the way.

Feel free to reach out. We’re ready to support your business through a smooth and successful transition

Posted on

IFRS 18 – Key Technical Changes to Financial Statement Presentation

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has issued IFRS 18 – Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements, which introduces a comprehensive restructuring of the statement of profit or loss and significantly expands disclosure requirements. Singapore is expected to adopt IFRS 18 into SFRS(I) for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, with full retrospective application.

Mandatory New Presentation Structure

Standardised Profit or Loss Categories

IFRS 18 introduces three mandatory, principle-based categories into the statement of profit or loss:

  • Operating

  • Investing

  • Financing

All income and expense items must be classified within these categories based on detailed application guidance. This represents a fundamental shift from existing practice, which allows more judgement in defining intermediate performance measures. The new structure aims to enhance cross-entity comparability and reduce diversity in practice.

Prescribed Subtotals

The standard introduces consistent subtotals across entities, such as:

  • Operating profit

  • Profit before financing and income taxes

Entities may no longer present bespoke subtotals unless they qualify as a Management-Defined Performance Measure (MPM) under the new disclosure framework.

Management-Defined Performance Measures (MPMs)

IFRS 18 establishes a specific framework for Management-Defined Performance Measures, defined as subtotals of income and expenses that:

  1. Are used in public communications outside the financial statements; and

  2. Reflect management’s view of an aspect of the entity’s overall financial performance.

Examples include Adjusted EBITDA, “core profit,” or other non-IFRS performance metrics commonly used in investor reporting.

For each MPM, entities must:

  • Provide a clear definition and description

  • Present a quantitative reconciliation to the nearest IFRS-defined subtotal

  • Disclose explanations of adjustments, including their nature and rationale

  • Present comparative information consistently across periods

This introduces discipline, transparency and comparability around non-GAAP performance metrics historically communicated without standardised requirements.

Enhanced Disaggregation Requirements

IFRS 18 tightens the requirements for disaggregation of income and expenses, requiring entities to:

  • Provide more granular breakdowns where necessary for users to understand performance

  • Avoid broad, aggregated line items such as “other expenses” unless immaterial

  • Apply a consistent basis for classification across the financial statements and notes

The standard specifies factors to assess whether items require further disaggregation, including nature, function, measurement basis, and variability.

Disclosures of “Unusual” Income and Expenses

IFRS 18 introduces explicit requirements to disclose unusual income and expense items, defined as items that:

  • Are not expected to recur in the near term; and

  • Have a significant effect on financial performance.

Entities must:

  • Identify such items based on the standard’s criteria

  • Disclose the amount, nature, and reason the item is considered unusual

  • Present comparative disclosures

This enhances users’ understanding of non-recurring items affecting performance trends.

Retrospective Application and Comparative Information

The standard requires full retrospective application, including:

  • Restating all comparative periods using the new P&L structure

  • Reclassifying historical income and expense items into operating, investing, and financing categories

  • Applying MPM definitions and reconciliations consistently to prior periods

  • Providing comparative disclosure of unusual items and disaggregation detail

As a result, entities presenting FY2027 financial statements will also present restated FY2026 comparatives under the IFRS 18 framework.

Implications for Reporting, Systems and Communications

The structural changes introduced by IFRS 18 will have significant implications for:

  • Financial statement presentation and mapping

  • Internal reporting frameworks

  • KPI and performance metric definitions

  • Investor and lender communication

  • Disclosure controls and accounting policy frameworks

Given the mandatory retrospective application and shift to standardised categories and subtotals, the adoption of IFRS 18 represents one of the most material presentation changes since the adoption of IFRS itself.

If you require technical guidance on IFRS 18 interpretation, presentation impacts, or disclosure implications, our team can support you with detailed analysis and implementation expertise.

Posted on

How to Close or Restructure a Singapore Company

Companies in Singapore may be wound up, struck off, or restructured depending on their financial situation. Whether your company is dormant, solvent, insolvent, or under creditor pressure, it’s important to understand the appropriate exit or rescue options under Singapore law.

This guide outlines five main options to legally close, restructure, or resolve your company’s affairs:

  • Strike-Off

  • Liquidation

  • Simplified Insolvency Programme (SIP)

  • Judicial Management (JM)

  • Receivership

Strike-Off (Deregistration)

Best for: Dormant companies with no assets or liabilities.

Strike-off is a voluntary process where a company applies to ACRA to be removed from the register.

Eligibility Conditions:

  • No business activity or assets.

  • No outstanding liabilities to IRAS, CPF, ACRA, or others.

  • No existing charges or ongoing legal proceedings.

  • Written consent of all directors.

Process:

  1. Finalise tax clearance with IRAS.

  2. Apply via BizFile+ to ACRA.

  3. ACRA issues a notice in the Gazette (30 days for objections).

  4. If no objections, company is struck off ~4 months from submission.

Cost Estimate:

  • ACRA fee: Free

  • Professional services: S$800 – S$2,000

Voluntary or Compulsory Liquidation

Best for: Companies with assets and liabilities.

There are 2 types:

  • Members’ Voluntary Liquidation (MVL) – company is solvent.

  • Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation (CVL) – company is insolvent and initiated by directors.

  • Compulsory Liquidation – ordered by the Court upon creditor’s petition.

Steps (MVL):

  1. Declare solvency and pass resolution.

  2. Appoint licensed liquidator.

  3. Realise assets, pay creditors, distribute surplus to shareholders.

  4. Liquidator files final returns and company is dissolved.

Cost Estimate:

  • MVL: S$8,000 – S$20,000+

  • CVL/Compulsory: May exceed S$30,000 depending on complexity.

Simplified Insolvency Programme (SIP)

Best for: Small, insolvent companies with simple affairs.

Introduced during COVID-19, SIP is a fast-track version of liquidation or debt restructuring for qualifying companies.

Eligibility:

  • Company’s total liabilities must not exceed $2 million (including prospective and contingent liabilities)

Two streams:

  • Simplified Winding-Up Programme (SWUP) – lower-cost version of CVL.

  • Simplified Debt Restructuring Programme (SDRP) – similar to scheme of arrangement but streamlined.

Cost Estimate:

  • S$3,000 – S$8,000

Time taken:

  • 9 months

Judicial Management (JM)

Best for: Companies with potential to be saved or restructured.

JM is a court-supervised process where a judicial manager is appointed to take control and attempt to rehabilitate the company.

Who can apply:

  • The company

  • Its creditors

  • Its liquidator (if applicable)

Benefits:

  • Automatic moratorium (legal protection from creditors)

  • Breathing room to restructure debt or find a buyer

  • Judicial manager can terminate unprofitable contracts

Outcome:

  • Company may recover, be sold, or proceed to liquidation if turnaround fails.

Cost Estimate:

  • S$20,000 – S$100,000+ (depends on duration and complexity)

Receivership

Best for: Secured creditors enforcing security.

Receivership occurs when a creditor (usually a bank) appoints a receiver to seize and realise specific assets under a debenture.

Scope:

  • Receiver manages only secured assets (e.g., land, receivables).

  • Directors may retain control over the rest of the company.

Common Scenarios:

  • Default on a loan secured by company assets.

  • Receiver sells business as a going concern or liquidates assets.

Outcome:

  • Often leads to liquidation after enforcement is complete.

Cost Estimate:

  • Depends on value and nature of assets; borne by proceeds of realisation.

Summary of Closure & Insolvency Options

Conclusion

Singapore provides multiple legal avenues to close or restructure a company, tailored to its financial position and future prospects. Whether your company is dormant, struggling, or facing creditor pressure, understanding the available options—from strike-off to judicial management—can help you exit responsibly, protect stakeholders, and avoid future penalties.

Need help choosing the right path? Our team of company secretaries and insolvency professionals can assist with compliance, closure strategy, and stakeholder communication.

Updates: There is an revision to the SLP program.

Please refer to here for details.